<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s missing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dorisandbertie.com/goodcopybadcopy/2008/11/05/whats-missing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dorisandbertie.com/goodcopybadcopy/2008/11/05/whats-missing/</link>
	<description>A blog about good business writing and bad. Especially the bad. Because there&#039;s so much more of the bad.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:16:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Hruzek</title>
		<link>http://www.dorisandbertie.com/goodcopybadcopy/2008/11/05/whats-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-1036</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Hruzek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 16:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daccreative.co.uk/goodcopybadcopy/?p=48#comment-1036</guid>
		<description>Wow, I&#039;m glad to know I wasn&#039;t the only one stumped by that! &#039;Course, the capper is, after all the aggravation of finally finding out how to submit - I didn&#039;t get in! Sheesh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I&#8217;m glad to know I wasn&#8217;t the only one stumped by that! &#8216;Course, the capper is, after all the aggravation of finally finding out how to submit &#8211; I didn&#8217;t get in! Sheesh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clare Lynch</title>
		<link>http://www.dorisandbertie.com/goodcopybadcopy/2008/11/05/whats-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>Clare Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daccreative.co.uk/goodcopybadcopy/?p=48#comment-717</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping by, Russell. Yes, it&#039;s something all of us struggle with. I learned quite a lesson when I was teaching a writing course once, which included a section on jargon. I had kept referring to &quot;copy&quot; - until one of my participants asked me what I meant by this strange word &quot;copy&quot;. I&#039;m embarrassed to say that I had assumed a level of knowledge by using writers&#039; jargon - &quot;writing&quot; or &quot;text&quot; would have been the more inclusive word to use!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by, Russell. Yes, it&#8217;s something all of us struggle with. I learned quite a lesson when I was teaching a writing course once, which included a section on jargon. I had kept referring to &#8220;copy&#8221; &#8211; until one of my participants asked me what I meant by this strange word &#8220;copy&#8221;. I&#8217;m embarrassed to say that I had assumed a level of knowledge by using writers&#8217; jargon &#8211; &#8220;writing&#8221; or &#8220;text&#8221; would have been the more inclusive word to use!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Cavanagh</title>
		<link>http://www.dorisandbertie.com/goodcopybadcopy/2008/11/05/whats-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Cavanagh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 22:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daccreative.co.uk/goodcopybadcopy/?p=48#comment-715</guid>
		<description>I have a degree of difficulty with this in some of my own stuff. I assume a certain degree of knowledge on the basis that those interested will have some ... but someone said to me yesterday that further simplification would perhaps be more inclusive (is &quot;inclusive&quot; one of your banned words (lol)? How near to first principles ... ?

Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a degree of difficulty with this in some of my own stuff. I assume a certain degree of knowledge on the basis that those interested will have some &#8230; but someone said to me yesterday that further simplification would perhaps be more inclusive (is &#8220;inclusive&#8221; one of your banned words (lol)? How near to first principles &#8230; ?</p>
<p>Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clare Lynch</title>
		<link>http://www.dorisandbertie.com/goodcopybadcopy/2008/11/05/whats-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>Clare Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daccreative.co.uk/goodcopybadcopy/?p=48#comment-679</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Mike! I hope blogging about you doesn&#039;t go against me in my submission!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Mike! I hope blogging about you doesn&#8217;t go against me in my submission!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Rundle</title>
		<link>http://www.dorisandbertie.com/goodcopybadcopy/2008/11/05/whats-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Rundle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daccreative.co.uk/goodcopybadcopy/?p=48#comment-678</guid>
		<description>You can submit right here:

http://9rules.com/submit/

We linked it up from the blog but not the main site yet. Sorry about that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can submit right here:</p>
<p><a href="http://9rules.com/submit/" rel="nofollow">http://9rules.com/submit/</a></p>
<p>We linked it up from the blog but not the main site yet. Sorry about that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

